ord=Math.random()*10000000000000000; document.write('');

Feedback

what's your question? be descriptive.

By: Asked

Insurance for a technician

I am an architectural technician and plan to go self-employed and advertise my architectural services via a website. I intend to only produce drawings for planning and building regulations approval. Will I need professional indemnity insurance and public liability insurance?

Add comment viewed 1,134 times Latest activity about 1 year ago

or Cancel

4 answers

  • 0

superstat_29

Just as a heads up if you are a member of CIAT and you are only a technician I would look at their literature with regards to offering services as a self employed person. If you are a technician I seem to recall you not being able to offer services, requiring an upgrade to MCIAT status.

I am only recalling this though so I may be wrong

or Cancel
  • 0

richard brindley

There is no statutory or professional requirement for you to have professional indemnity insurance (PII) or public liability insurance (PLI) to provide architectural services.

However, if you are a chartered member of the Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists you are obliged to maintain appropriate PII. Public liability insurance may also be required, though that depends on the nature of the work. CIAT members can obtain insurance on favourable terms from brokers approved by the institute. Check the CIAT requirements on its website, www.ciat.org.uk.

You need to be careful not to use the “architect” word to describe yourself or your services, as this is a protected title under the Architects Registration Act.

Even if you are not a chartered member of any institute, it is still a very good idea to have both types of cover; not only for your own peace of mind but also for your client’s interests. PII is primarily for the benefit of your client but limits your risks should there be a substantiated claim against your work. If your work is likely to affect the public. PLI limits your risk of claims. It also tends to be relatively inexpensive as the risks are small, though the value of public liability claims can be very high.

Your decision depends on your personal attitude to risk. If you think that personal property, travel and health insurance are worthwhile, you will probably also have a similar approach to insuring your business activities.

or Cancel
  • 0

j francis [ Editor ]

Richard Brindley's comments are to the point and his closing comment on your attitude to risk is worth taking particular note of.

Even if you haven had a claim made against you if one should crop up then even with any insurance behind you it is still a worrying and unpleasant experience.

Consider carefully the size of jobs you undertake and review this regularly, if that dreams job comes along and you find yourself working with less cover than you need it is a frightening time!

We are also living in a litigious culture and the pit falls found from ever increasingly complex legislation are many.

My advice would be to make sure you have insurance cover and also keep as fully briefed as you can on current and upcoming legislation and try to find out if there are CPD events locally to you that are open to you to attend (networking with other local firms, including engineers, quantity surveyors etc, can help with this).

Finally I would suggest that no matter how watertight a disclaimer you put on your drawings etc they wont have been tested in the courts, for example you might clearly state the "drawing is for the purpose of obtaining Building Regulations Approval only and not a working drawing" or similar but I always worry this is possible solicitor fodder!

or Cancel